Use cases · Someone looking for work

Looking for a job

Say once what you want. Your assistant finds and screens the openings, drafts what each one asks for, and applies to the ones you approve.

The situation

Sofia is a product manager looking for her next role. The listings are spread over a dozen boards and careers sites, most of them are wrong for her, and every application asks the same twenty questions in a different form. The searching and the form-filling eat the time that should go into the few applications worth making well.

Handing it over

You: Here’s my CV and my LinkedIn. I’m looking for a senior product role in Berlin, permanent.

Assistant: A few questions first, one at a time. What’s the lowest salary you’d take?

You: 85,000.

Assistant: And anywhere you wouldn’t work?

You: No crypto.

Assistant: Your brief is written. I’ll search the job boards and careers sites until I have ten worth your look, each with a cover letter drafted where it asks for one.

Her CV, what she wants and what she won’t do are written down once. Every search from then on starts from them, and so does every application.

Sofia decides

Her assistant reads each opening against her brief and keeps only the ones worth her time, with why they match and what might not. Then it opens her shortlist:

Round 2: your shortlist

Nine worth your look, out of 140 openings read. Two applications are waiting on an answer only you can give.

9to review
4applied
2questions for you
  • Senior PM · payments scale-upStrong

    Berlin, hybrid · €90–100k

    Owns checkout. Your two years on payments match every must-have. Cover letter drafted.

  • Product lead · mobility appPossible

    Berlin · €85–95k

    Concern: asks for fluent German; your CV says conversational.

Applications are asking

  • What is your notice period?Answer

    Asked by 2 applications. You’ll only be asked once.

Sofia’s comment: “No roles that are mostly delivery management.”

She approves the payments role with her own edit to the letter, approves the mobility one anyway, and answers the notice-period question. Her approval is the go-ahead to apply, and nothing else is. Her comment goes into the brief, so the next round stops proposing that kind of role.

The next evening

The next evening, a new chat

You: Apply to the two I approved.

Assistant: The payments role is filed, with your edited letter. The mobility company’s careers site needs an account: create one in your browser and I’ll carry on from there.

Each application follows that posting’s own instructions, in Sofia’s name, and never says anything about her that she hasn’t said herself. Her notice period is stored now, so no application will ask her again.

Better every round

Every round starts from the ones before: what she approved, what she turned down and why, every answer she has given. The tenth round is aimed far better than the first, and Sofia never repeats herself.

More stories

  • Candidate search Hands over a job description, reviews the shortlist, and their feedback steers the next round.
  • A software team Every assistant knows what is waiting for its person. People decide what gets built, how it is split, and when it is done.
  • What to post about The assistant keeps track of the topics in their area and what they have posted on, and drafts on what is worth posting today. They approve, edit or discard.
  • Relationships at scale Says who counts. The assistant finds the people, writes each a personal note, and keeps track of every conversation. Nothing is sent without them.
  • Watching competitors Names the products and the competitors. The assistant matches them across sites, checks every week, and shows what changed.
  • Every page, reviewed Sets the goal and the rules once. The assistant goes over every page, records what it found and fixed, and brings back only what needs them.